Re: “Arizona's Proposition 211, a pivotal constitutional amendment designed to enhance transparency in political campaign financing,…” That’s not right,
is it? Proposition 211 was statutory, wasn’t it?
Re: “Securing 72% approval is a remarkable feat, yet this consensus is seemingly disregarded by those who benefit from undisclosed political spending.”
To paraphrase George Will, some things are beyond the reach of majorities. If something is unconstitutional, its popularity should have no bearing on whether it’s upheld. Lots of famous SCOTUS cases overturned practices that some folks really liked!
Toma vs Fontes ... yet another example of Speaker Toma wasting taxpayer money in the name of helping rich people. The Flat Tax and unlimited ESA expansion two other ideas that he personally championed and that primarily benefit rich Arizonans.
Re: “Arizona's Proposition 211, a pivotal constitutional amendment designed to enhance transparency in political campaign financing,…” That’s not right,
is it? Proposition 211 was statutory, wasn’t it?
Re: “Securing 72% approval is a remarkable feat, yet this consensus is seemingly disregarded by those who benefit from undisclosed political spending.”
To paraphrase George Will, some things are beyond the reach of majorities. If something is unconstitutional, its popularity should have no bearing on whether it’s upheld. Lots of famous SCOTUS cases overturned practices that some folks really liked!
So Chat GPT is sexist and racist unless one explicitly demands a “diverse” image…
Toma vs Fontes ... yet another example of Speaker Toma wasting taxpayer money in the name of helping rich people. The Flat Tax and unlimited ESA expansion two other ideas that he personally championed and that primarily benefit rich Arizonans.